JeffM wrote:
Danny Kile wrote:
I use a program called Local Website Archive.
http://www.aignes.com/lwa.htm
I find it fascinating that the website for a company in that business
doesn't pass muster:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.aignes.com/lwa.htm
5 Errors
Compare:
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modified.html
Who says that Company Web Designers (whether in house or paid) pay one
whit attention about W3C specifications.
Granted the ones the are here have had it hammered in their head. I'd be
very surprised if MS, Adobe, Intuit if you were check theirs would be. 5
error is not a heck of a lot.
On my own site I've spent literally months (not every day and not every
minute) re working mine to be W#C compliant to at least XML (XHTML) 1.0.
Transitional spec. And I still not sure I've go everything.
--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. "If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org
mailto:[email protected]
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
