>Danny Kile wrote: >>I checked Mocrosoft.com, >> M$'s stock in trade is BREAKING the standards of others. This should come as no surprize to you. ...or are you an M$ fanboi?
>>cnn.com, tvguide.com, weather.com, adobe.com >>and uweather.com thet all had hundreds of errors. >> Yes, this bears out my point that many incompetent people are slopping together sites --and other ignorant people are paying them for that drek. My *specific* point was that a company that is producing a Web-specific product should know wrong from right in this arena. >>All their site seem to work just fine, >> For today. Using THAT browser. http://google.com/search?q=cache:m2XM97fMGMIJ:www.evolt.org/article/Forward_compatibility_and_web_standards/17/60115/index.html+*-screwed-these-*-up+*-*-broken-links-everywhere+Large-sections-*-*-disappeared+mutual+mutual+*-didn't-support-*-proprietary-*-*-*-*-*+only-includes-Netscape-*+mutual+table-layout-images-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*+it.did.not+*-*-*-*-incorrect-content-type-header#comment-60184 http://tinyurl.com/StandardsMatter >>so much for validator. >> Ah. Ignorance abounds. So do low standards among the ignorant. Mark Hansen wrote: >If it's not correct, it's not correct. There are no two way about this. You beat me to it. I was going to say it as: It's the difference between right and wrong. As stated, people in that line of business should be aware of the proper form for a Web page, as that impacts the way their product works. My link goes into the effects of standards and the persistance of the apparent quality of a page. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
