Phillip Jones wrote:

And you did notice this part above .

"I always wanted to ask you to *write your response above my message* and
 > *not mix with my original text*. It takes me a long time to read your
 > response and often I just give up."

Yet everyone here extols the virtues of bottom posting. Your supposed to post especially in emails to what the receiver is accustomed to. Not your ridged guidelines as what is prim & proper.

You've missed the point entirely if you think this is about "my rigid guidelines as to what is prim and proper." Read again my last paragraph:

It bleeping blew me away. *I thought I was doing him a favor* by putting each answer with the corresponding question.

If you get a message from a person either personal or business and they bottom post, post bottom post. If you get said message and they put replies to you at top, then they demand top post. You grit your teeth and Top post. Better to use their method and gain their business, rather than go by some silly posting guideline and lose a $20,000 job. Your person just has the chutzpa to speak up and say how they want things. I am sure there are others out the.

And then the recipient, following the same principle, should reply to me in my system (bottom posting), creating an incomprehensible hodge-podge when I top-post for his benefit in reply.

--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to