I have to admit, I actually expected more than two replies "as proposals" and at least ONE unique proposal.

To summarize the two options:
* Use one that KaiRo already submitted, which is/was partially implemented and a few vocally opposed.
* DO NOT CHANGE A THING ABOUT HOW IT WAS IN SM 1.1

Choice 2 is woefully not going to happen, sorry. especially as there was no explanation on why the old UI is/was better than anything else.

I don't personally feel strongly about choice 1, given the preexisting stop energy, and that I don't feel its the best though it certainly is a step forward.

Given that absolutely no one cared enough to step up and write even an ascii proposal of what they feel would look right, when I volunteered to code it; I don't suspect I will code any improvements anytime soon either; youre just going to have to live with current suck unless you care to assist in the process.

--
~Justin Wood (Callek)
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to