Daniel wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
JeffM wrote:
John Klein wrote:
I need a way to create several HTML email messages
for transmission by 3rd party email list owners.

First, tell them that is the stupid way to do things.

Don't you understand, USENET is not the prime thrust any more, and not
everyone sticks with the more efficient 6-bit BCD characters either! But
egotistical people who think they must thrust their choices on everyone
else are still with us. Go get a sharp chisel and fresh tablet and write
your blog.

Email is a plain text medium.

That hasn't been true for decades.

HTML is for Web pages.
1) Create the HTML page.
2) Upload the page to a server.
3) Email only the link to the Web page.

Feel free. In fact please do. Any time you feel the need to say some
egotistical self-righteous thing in "I do it this way, so no one else
should do it some other way" please put it on a web site and post the
link so anyone who care can look at it.

Outside the obvious drawbacks that it add vast complexity (other
applications and servers, more networking) and makes the material
available to anyone, it's more likely to cause misunderstanding when no
emphasis is used. Not to mention text not being flowed and
self-formatting into the reader's choice of width rather the poster's idea.

People read email on many devices with many types of display, HTML
allows the reader more control over presentation. The days of email over
300 bps dial up stored on 10MB eight inch drives is over. There's simply
no reason to stick to text any more, and if you choose to filter, please
do it quietly.

And I haven't mentioned that many people read on devices where web
browsing is either not supported or is extra cost. The world has moved
past the time when there was a benefit to saving a few bytes, the cost
of inferior communication is now higher than any saving. If you want
saving, limit message size and reject messages with excessive quoting.
That still has benefit.


And so says Bill Davidson whom, I guessing, has ADSL/Cable, so expects EVERYBODY to have it!! (and I can go back to 50baud and 75baud machines and punched tape readers as well!)

When I headed a server group for Prodigy we had a about a million people of dial-up, I'm highly aware of speeds. I remember the huge jump from 110 to 300 baud in the 70s. But a message is not smaller on a web page than it is in mail, just less private and harder for the recipient to read.

And Bill if I limit my downloaded messages to only those of 1kByte or less, that still doesn't stop your 1MByte message arriving on my ISP's server for my mail account, so costing me extra because you've exceeded my daily 500kByte mail limit. (Don't worry, Bill, it's not just you, I'm still trying to educate my family members as well!!)

Doesn't stop 1MB plain text either. Big data is big data, and if you have people sending you stuff like that you might be well served to go to gmail, and use a reader which lets you choose not to download text of any message over a certain size unless initiated manually. gmail supports IMAP as well as the web interface.

--
Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
  "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to