Ray_Net <[email protected]> wrote : > Jane Galt wrote: >> Ray_Net<[email protected]> wrote : >> >>> Jane Galt wrote: >>>> Ray_Net<[email protected]> wrote : >>>> >>>>> Daniel wrote: >>>>>> Jane Galt wrote: >>>>>>> "S. Beaulieu"<[email protected]> wrote : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Roger Fink a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> <snip> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Why do I have to throw out the baby with the bathwater and go to >>>>>>> something >>>>>>> else, JUST because of a programming problem where they wont let me >> use >>>> my >>>>>>> own emailer? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Because, Jane, the SeaMonkey developers want you to use their program, >>>>>> which they think is the best!! >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This is exactly the same position of microsoft. >>>>> If the previous version of SM permit to *not* us the SM-mail part - I >>>>> see no real reason tu cut away this possibility. Except that the >>>>> developers lives in their gold-tower ... neglecting the people using >>>>> their product. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ultimately it's their software, and if they want to alienate some people >>>> from using it, their choice. >>>> >>>> >>> So, why did you complain ? >>> >> >> I've been asking if there's a fix. >> > There will be no fix, because, it's not a bug - it's a decision of the > developers on the "Mozilla base" ... >
Ok, I understand that now, and it's my decision to hassle with it or use some other bowser. -- - Jane Galt
_______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
