Ray_Net wrote:
Jane Galt wrote:
Ray_Net<[email protected]> wrote :
Jane Galt wrote:
Ray_Net<[email protected]> wrote :
Daniel wrote:
Jane Galt wrote:
"S. Beaulieu"<[email protected]> wrote :
Roger Fink a écrit :
<snip>
Why do I have to throw out the baby with the bathwater and go to
something
else, JUST because of a programming problem where they wont let me
use
my
own emailer?
Because, Jane, the SeaMonkey developers want you to use their
program,
which they think is the best!!
This is exactly the same position of microsoft.
If the previous version of SM permit to *not* us the SM-mail part - I
see no real reason tu cut away this possibility. Except that the
developers lives in their gold-tower ... neglecting the people using
their product.
Ultimately it's their software, and if they want to alienate some
people
from using it, their choice.
So, why did you complain ?
I've been asking if there's a fix.
There will be no fix, because, it's not a bug - it's a decision of the
developers on the "Mozilla base" ...
But there is a "work around" that Jane's been given and it also didn't
work!!
Daniel
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
