Philip Chee wrote:
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 10:57:02 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 10:06:59 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote:
two extensions were found as a temporary fix. and promise (maybe
hollow) that a form of it would return in 2.1. of course knowing how the
developers do things at Mozilla. Probably was said just get us off their
backs until the subject was forgotten.
Please refrain from unwarranted cynicism (warranted cynicism is of
course another matter).
Work in progress:
http://home.kairo.at/blog/2010-07/data_manager_1_0
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=569341
Phil
Well let us just say then I'll believe it when I see it. How's that?
So. What's stopping you from downloading v1.0 and installing it into
SeaMonkey 2.1a2 and taking it for a test drive? It contains the same
code that is currently in the process of being reviewed (we have very
picky reviewers).
You honestly seem to the only developer that seems to listen to Users,
rather than only to other developers. And for that I applaud you sir.
I'm not a SeaMonkey developer! I'm just a rabble-rousing extension
author. I keep telling KaiRo that but he doesn't believe me....
Phil
Phil, I would have thought it would be more in the sense of this thread,
if you had typed "....but he doesn't *hear* me....".
Daniel
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
