On 12.09.2010 03:03, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message ---
> Jay Garcia wrote: >> On 11.09.2010 17:13, Ray_Net wrote: >> >> --- Original Message --- >> >>> Chris Ilias wrote: >>>> On 10-09-10 5:51 PM, Ray_Net wrote: >>>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 >>>>> >>>>> No changes from 7 years ago. >>>>> >>>>> The request is already coded when we do a forward. >>>>> >>>>> So it should be easy to implement it when doing a reply. >>>>> >>>>> I don't understand why developpers works on what they want instead of >>>>> what we need ... evenwhile the work is a minimum task .... >>>> >>>> Is the intent of your post to get help with something, or draw >>>> attention >>>> of developers? >>>> >>> >>> Just to draw attention of developpers ... in my opinion it would be a >>> minimum work to be done to (correct this bug)/(implement this >>> suggestion) >> >> You allude "minimum work", is this from your own personal experience as >> a programmer or are you just making a guess? >> >> > i think ... a personal expérience... the coding could be like... > If Reply-header-like-forward is true then > begin > <reply-header-composition> > end; > > The <reply-header-composition> could be call <forward-header-composition>; > or a copy/paste of the <forward-header-composition> coding. File a RFE bug. -- *Jay Garcia - Netscape/Flock Champion* www.ufaq.org Netscape - Firefox - SeaMonkey - Flock - Thunderbird _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
