On 21.09.2010 16:40, Ray_Net wrote: --- Original Message ---
> Jay Garcia wrote: >> On 21.09.2010 10:11, Ray_Net wrote: >> >> --- Original Message --- >> >>> Jay Garcia wrote: >>>> On 20.09.2010 16:09, Ray_Net wrote: >>>> >>>> --- Original Message --- >>>> >>>>> W3BNR wrote: >>>>>> On 9/20/2010 5:05 AM Ray_Net wrote: >>>>>>> Philip Chee wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:20:48 -0400, Phillip Jones wrote: >>>>>>>>> Jay Garcia wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> That is not true, please stop spreading misinformation. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I've never seen a case where developers corrected a bug a user >>>>>>>>> found. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You are not looking hard enough. Look harder. I fixed the following >>>>>>>> bugs: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Bug 86400 reported by David Carroll >>>>>>>> Bug 156734 reported by Jeremy M. Dolan >>>>>>>> Bug 388349 reported by Ed >>>>>>>> Bug 395371 reported by arno renevier >>>>>>>> Bug 414014 reported by Eyal Rozenberg >>>>>>>> Bug 482433 reported by Chris Wimlett >>>>>>>> Bug 534248 reported by Aleksej >>>>>>>> Bug 534322 reported by Kevin Brosnan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Actually I fixed more but I got bored searching through bugzilla. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Could you fix this >>>>>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218258 >>>>>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595696 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> or tell me how can i fix it >>>>>> >>>>>> "Bug" 218258 - only 28 votes in 7 years? I don't think it will get >>>>>> "fixed". More of a new feature request than a bug. >>>>> >>>>> Only 28 votes .... and you forgot the huge list of bugs closed >>>>> because a >>>>> duplicate of this one. >>>>> >>>>>> Anyhow 'gator' on April 4, 2010, suggested a work-a-round. See >>>>>> comment >>>>>> #61 at the bug page. This should satisfy the few that need the >>>>>> function. >>>>> >>>>> NO this doesnot statify the request - In addition the asked thing is >>>>> already coded in the forward mechanism - this mechanism could be >>>>> easely >>>>> called when doing a "reply" - this not a great job to be done. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You speak about the fact that this bug should be an RFE .... this >>>>> why i >>>>> created https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595696 which is a >>>>> RFE ... this RFE will stay at it is for another cycle of 7 years or >>>>> more. As Phillip Jones said: 'developers believe that users can't know >>>>> what they want, that only developers know what users want. And tend to >>>>> ignore users wishes.' and i add : Evenwhile if the work to be >>>>> done is >>>>> mimimal. >>>> >>>> If it's "minimal" than add a comment to your RFE explaining the minimal >>>> steps in detail so that programmers reading it will get it and do it in >>>> their spare time. >>>> >>> if you read the text, you will imediately see that's a minimal work - in >>> short: >>> 1. Create an option named "Reply-header-like-forward" and use it when >>> replying to a mail is this way: >>> >>> If Reply-header-like-forward is true then >>> call<forward-header-composition>; >>> >>> --------------------------- >>> If i know how to modify SeaMonkey, i can give a try. >> >> That is not programming steps needed to upgrade the module(s) necessary >> to effect the change(s). If it's that simple then do it. >> > > If someone told me not to do it, but how i can participate for the > coding .... i can try to implement it. Go for it, your contribution will be most appreciated. -- *Jay Garcia - Netscape/Flock Champion* www.ufaq.org Netscape - Firefox - SeaMonkey - Flock - Thunderbird _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
