NoOp wrote: > Then you'd be seriously mistaken. Users have spent considerable time & > effort integrating lightning calendars & data into their systems. If you > think that there was backlash with SM 1.1.x and forms, wait until they > try 2.1 and try backing down to 2.0 and realize that their calendars no > longer are compatible. > http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=1248265 > <http://mozilla-xp.com/mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey/Please-help-testing-For-SeaMonkey-2.1-Alpha-1-candidates> > > I *highly* recommend that the "Council" sort out the issues (personal > and technical) with the SeaMonkey & Lightning folks *before* any SM 2.1 > release. If you don't then I suspect that you'll continue to lose space > with MS Office & other browser/calendar integration offerings. IMO > seamless Lightning integration with SeaMonkey is critical to SeaMonkey's > future.
I'd like to add my unsolicited $0.02. I'm one of the SeaMonkey devs (well, beginner I must add and a relative newcomer to the scene, though I have used SeaMonkey, and before that Mozilla and Netscape). Should have volunteered a long time ago. As Justin pointed out, the issue is human resources. It's simple as that. It's not personal. Not Technical. (Well, to me, my skill set really is limited I'm sorry to say). I'm still earnestly learning the ropes, but there's really only so many hours in a day and how much I can volunteer for it. While I can't speak for everyone, but I believe the feeling is the same. We all want to add all features, and fix all bugs in SeaMonkey and its associated extensions(in this case, Lightning); but we really don't have that much time and we need more devs to help out. What I do thank for is you and everyone's continued patience with the dev team. I'll do my darndest to help with the bugs and features while trying to learn the ropes as well. Edmund _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
