On 12/29/2010 06:33 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > On 12/29/2010 5:07 PM, Ricardo Palomares Martínez wrote: >>> - will provisions be made for importing/exporting lightning calendars? >> >> That's my biggest concern, too.:-) > > Lightning is an extension, one which does not directly provide support > for SeaMonkey, and is also [last I knew] currently targeting Gecko 1.9.2 > which there was and is no SeaMonkey release on. > > We as the Council hopes there is a suitable solution for lightning > users, and will support the efforts where possible, but I do not foresee > anyone from the SeaMonkey team devoting direct time to get export/import > improved in the near future. >
Then you'd be seriously mistaken. Users have spent considerable time & effort integrating lightning calendars & data into their systems. If you think that there was backlash with SM 1.1.x and forms, wait until they try 2.1 and try backing down to 2.0 and realize that their calendars no longer are compatible. http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=1248265 <http://mozilla-xp.com/mozilla.dev.apps.seamonkey/Please-help-testing-For-SeaMonkey-2.1-Alpha-1-candidates> I *highly* recommend that the "Council" sort out the issues (personal and technical) with the SeaMonkey & Lightning folks *before* any SM 2.1 release. If you don't then I suspect that you'll continue to lose space with MS Office & other browser/calendar integration offerings. IMO seamless Lightning integration with SeaMonkey is critical to SeaMonkey's future. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
