On 27/03/11 18:25, Dano wrote:
On Mar 23, 8:25 am, Stan<[email protected]> wrote:
I'd like to express my appreciation to all the developers and others who
have devoted themselves to keeping SeaMonkey alive and still the most
logical way for integrating browser, mail, newsgroups, and other things.
I started in 1997 with Netscape and thanks to so many of you I am still
going strong on that path with SeaMonkey. Thank you again for making
this possible.
Stan Pierce
Hey Stan...
Thanks for stating this publicly. I whole-heartedly agree with your
comments.
I have been using Netscape, and then SeaMonkey for many years.
I have encouraged a number of my friends to use it as well.
One of my "selling points" is that hackers and virus writers go for
the "more popular" or "better known" browsers.
SeaMonkey is not one of those, so I'm convinced that it (we) are not
in their line of fire.
Thnx...Dano
Maybe, maybe not. The Gecko rendering engine is common to Firefox,
Thunderbird and SeaMonkey, remember, so exploits targeting Firefox could
conceivably hit (Thunderbird HTML and) SeaMonkey as well. It is true
though, that MSIE and Windows still have the bigger share of the
worldwide market, so on SeaMonkey on Linux I don't feel like being near
the center of the enemy's fire.
Best regards,
Tony.
--
"But what we need to know is, do people want nasally-insertable
computers?"
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
