Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >And of course a compliant site would get fewer calls, would it not? > In a perfect world: Yes. In a world where M$ is in the browser market: Who knows?
You're forgetting that not only is Internet Exploder not W3C- compliant, the various versions aren't even compatible with each other. What a steaming pile. Smart Web developers quote a base price for a W3C-compliant page and an additional charge for each version of M$'s crap that the client needs to support. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
