JeffM wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
And of course a compliant site would get fewer calls, would it
not?
In a perfect world: Yes. In a world where M$ is in the browser
market: Who knows?
In the long term, if enough sites were compliant, M$ would have to shape
up. In the real world, of course, the whip is in the other hand. :-(
You're forgetting that not only is Internet Exploder not W3C-
compliant, the various versions aren't even compatible with each
other. What a steaming pile.
Not forgetting, just choosing not to mention.
Smart Web developers quote a base price for a W3C-compliant page and
an additional charge for each version of M$'s crap that the client
needs to support.
Makes sense.
--
War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left.
--
Paul B. Gallagher
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
