David Wilkinson wrote:
Are there any issues with upgrading directly from 2.0.14 to 2.2?
My suggestion is don't "upgrade", run in parallel. I never get rid of a version of an OS or an App until I am convinced that the replacement is preferable in all aspects. I often keep previous versions of both OSs and apps because there was some element of the previous I wanted/needed. This especially applies to Mozilla products because they change a lot. Try before you buy.
I have been running the Mozilla suite since the beginning as a continuation of Netscape. My current mail and bookmarks files all started life in Netscape. I have never done anything with Any Mozilla product that could be considered an "upgrade". I run multiple versions in parallel. Once, while searching for the date/time of the injection of a particular bug, I had twenty versions of Seamonkey on the HDD, all using the same profile. I commonly have two or three versions of SM each for Win and OS/2, all using the same profile and data - mail, news, bookmarks. I even have a SM1119 that uses the bookmarks from SM2.1. That is easy, going the other way is a little more work.
This is all easier if you don't use the executables. If you use the ZIP files you just unzip, change the sub-directory name to something meaningful, create a run object, and you have a parallel app.
It is also easy to run single or multiple versions from multiple profiles. This is helpful when you want to try something or things get weird. Just make the run object target look like this "H:\SM21-Win\seamonkey.exe -Profilemanager"
Mozilla products are designed to work for us, not visa-versa. Have fun, Ray _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
