Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-07-09 2:11 PM, Lee wrote:
...............

SeaMonkey 2.2 and Firefox 5 are stable.

But the automatic update script isn't even out yet. So 2.2 hasn't had
a chance to spread yet.
Of course it may be declared stable by edict, with all fixes later,
in future versions, mixed in with new features.

According to Callek SM 2.3 is expected in about a month.

So where is there any evidence of stability?

Back in the SM 1.x.x days, SM 1.0.1 would have been thought "Stable" at some time and at that same time, dev work would have been occurring for SM 1.0.2, and SM 1.0.3 might have been the bleeding edge version.

Back in the SM 2.0.x days, SM 2.0.1 would have been thought "Stable" at some time and at that same time, dev work would have been occurring for SM 2.0.2, and SM 2.0.3 might have been the bleeding edge version.

Now, the SM development team are saying that SM 2.2 is the best they've got, but they are working on SM 2.3 and also 2.4 and 2.5 (bleeding edge)

So, about all that's happened is that they have done away with the "0", the SM 2 base will probably last as long as the SM 1 base lasted.

IMHO, anyway!
--
Daniel
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to