Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-07-10 8:52 PM, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote:
Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-07-09 2:11 PM, Lee wrote:
...............
SeaMonkey 2.2 and Firefox 5 are stable.
But the automatic update script isn't even out yet. So 2.2 hasn't had
a chance to spread yet.
Of course it may be declared stable by edict, with all fixes later,
in future versions, mixed in with new features.
According to Callek SM 2.3 is expected in about a month.
So where is there any evidence of stability?
When end-users go to the SeaMonkey website to download the latest stable
version, they are given SeaMonkey 2.2. That means alpha and beta testing
of 2.2 is done. If the auto-update to 2.2 is not available yet, that
just means that the auto-update to 2.2 is not ready yet. It may need
more testing; maybe it just needs to be localized. But just because the
auto-update from previous versions to 2.2 is not available yet does not
mean that 2.2 itself is not stable. If end-users want to update without
using the auto-update they can go to <http://www.seamonkey-project.org/>
right now.
Why did you speak about "stability" when we see a too rapid changing.
I just intalled 2.1 because t was presented as the best, now 2.2 is the
best, 2.3 is not far from 2.2, etc .... should we consider 2.x changes
as minor release so we can jump from 2.0 to 2.1, or 2.2 or 2.3 or 2.4 or
2.5 ? With a major release in 3.0 where perhaps we need to be in 2.5
when we decided to go to 3.0 ... without the possibility to go from 2.0
to 2.0 ?
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
