On 18/07/2011 12:50, Philip Chee wrote: > On 18/07/2011 10:46, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj wrote: >> JeffM wrote: >>>> JeffM wrote: >>>>> Whenever I see these long diatribes about SeaMonkey, >>>>> I note that they never mention the authors' participation >>>>> in the Release Candidate trial/review process. >>>>> >>> Jay Garcia wrote: >>>> What else is required other than to be a "user", >>>> >>> A critique that comes as late as so many of these do >>> could easily be characterized as "bitching". >>> >>> OTOH, those folks who are prone to complaining >>> *should* be the ones who point out shortcomings >>> **when something can more easily be done about those** >>> i.e. **early** aka **during pre-release**. >>> >> All right , then where does the developer coouncil/ >> governing body publish the details of the planned >> changes to be introduced in the next release, so that >> interested users can make their comments known >> **early** aka **during pre-release**. >> (and then how closely do they follow/stick to >> these published plans?) >> :) :) :) :) ...... > > For the 2.1 development process: > https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey:Features:2.1 > > https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/Features/2.2 > > https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/Features/2.3
And the fortnightly Tuesday meeting notes of course. https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey/StatusMeetings Phil -- Philip Chee <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
