PhillipJones wrote:
Paul wrote:
On Jul 23, 6:16 am, Robert Kaiser<ka...@kairo.at> wrote:
Could you point us to those? Seems like something we'd at least want to
work around on 2.3 or so.
I am going back, I can't live with 2.2 until someone fixes all the
problems. If I lose data, I'm done with Mozilla-based programs.
Don't people work out these details before they foist a mess like this
on so many people?
That's a Fault of this new fast Track software release. They don't test
nor keep a version long enough so the Pile bugs upon bugs, upon, bugs,
upon bugs until it impossible to fix. everyone is so anxious to keep up
with Chrome and IE. I use neither. I don't care to. I would rather have
software that's tested enough to catch major bugs. And at some point
this hunker down and spit new versions is going to take its toll on the
developers. they are going to get to the point they will burn out say
"Shxx on this" and drop out.
But hey I am but a lowly user and users opinions are worth a grain of
salt anyway.
I agree with you. Mixing bug fixes, security fixes *AND* new features
introduce extra bugs ... developpers should refrain of pushing new
features so often.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
