Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 07 Aug 2011 12:12:48 +0100, /Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd)/:
I agree that some of the critiques have lacked focus; but in
general, I believe that those who are most vocal in criticising
the current changes in Seamonkey development and release are
also amongst those who are most deeply concerned that Seamonkey
/should/ remain alive and usable : they are, in the main,
people who (for better or worse) have come to depend on Seamonkey,
and who are genuinely afraid that recent changes do not bode
well for the future.
The only thing I'm genuinely afraid of is that the last few people who
care about, and have enough knowledge to develop and maintain SeaMonkey
might loose interest because of so much unreasonable criticism going
on. From my point of view every change to the SeaMonkey 2+ versions is
well justified and reflects the capabilities of the SeaMonkey team.
This is what I've been trying to explain previously, and further below.
To more eloquently say the same. That "loose interest" is a real
problem. And sometimes even I do feel that pressure reading these groups.
The term for it is "Stop Energy":
* http://bcsaller.blogspot.com/2005/11/stop-energy.html
(or do more googling/researching yourself on the concept)
--
~Justin Wood (Callek), SeaMonkey Council Member
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
