Sun, 07 Aug 2011 16:44:59 +0100, /Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd)/:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 07 Aug 2011 11:31:21 -0400, /PhillipJones/:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
The problem with the so called "constructive criticism" I see
widespread in this group, is it doesn't help keeping the
SeaMonkey product alive, most importantly, and then usable,
both related to the Mozilla platform dependency remark I've
given previously.
if its widespread doesn't tell you something.
It tells me just that - lots of ignorant users ranting.
Stanimir, I understand and respect your defence of the
Seamonkey project team, but I really think you need to
take on board the fact that when criticism is widespread,
it is more often the case that the criticism is justified
than that all those making the criticism are ill-informed.
The widespread criticism in this group does not necessary mean the
criticism is widespread amongst all SeaMonkey users. It could mean
number of frequent visitors, along with few accidental ones, tend to
pour unwarranted hatred rather than be supportive.
While the widespreading could be a symptom to a problem, I've been
observing this group long enough to deduce most of the criticism
seen is just ignorant babble.
--
Stanimir
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
