David Duling wrote:
I have been using Seamonkey for several years for editing simple HTML pages with CSS, tables, images, etc... I just installed SM 2.2. I have a couple of problems...
I'll be curious about the answer to your problems. I've rejected the move to SM 2.2 solely because of the HTML page composer issues that users have complained about since its release. I guess the bottom line is that I'm waiting for 2.3 to see if people indicate that the problems have been eliminated (but I fear that isn't a priority, so I doubt it is happening.) My fallback is using kompozer instead of SM's Composer; but that sort of eliminates the advantages of a browser *suite*, doesn't it? Why else do we use SeaMonkey if we don't want a suite with all the components working?
-- Ken Rudolph _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
