On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 04:25:31 -0500, Ron Hunter <[email protected]> wrote in <[email protected]>:
>On 8/17/2011 9:54 PM, Peter Boulding wrote: >> On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:33:59 -0700, Sailfish >> <[email protected]> wrote in >> <[email protected]>: >> >> [mozilla.support.seamonkey,mozilla.support.firefox reinserted] >> >>> A quick search of this newsgroup would have shown you that this topic >>> has been brought up several times and deemed OFF-TOPIC for this >>> newsgroup. >> >> "Has been deemed?" You should listen to yourself. >> >> The current "let's replace version numbers with 'up to date' or 'not up to >> date' and sod add-ons" idiocy is so stunningly crass and so rightly >> controversial that it's going to get discussed *everywhere* whether you like >> it or not... and no amount of "off topic here there and everywhere else >> apart from the Free Speech Zone we set up well away from the building" is >> going to stop it. >> >It is such an earth-shatteringly important thing, right? Look where it's going: <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=678775> Money quote: "It is part of the phasing out of version numbers in Firefox that's already well under way (though still incomplete.)" -- Regards, Peter Boulding [email protected] (to e-mail, remove "UNSPAM") Fractal Images and Music: http://www.pboulding.co.uk/ http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default.cfm?bandID=794240&content=music _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
