Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: >> Insert -> Characters and Symbols >> has no options. > > Rob, unfortunately this is a known issue, I plan to release an addon within the week to correct this, as a hotfix. and will get the real fix into a 2.4.2 *IFF* there is another reason for a "chemspill" release. In many ways, this hearkens back to my message of a day or so ago, where I expressed my concerns that Seamonkey users were beginning to lose their brand loyalty, almost certainly as a result (direct or indirect) of Seamonkey's following Firefox's rapid release schedule as well as its seeming determination to follow Firefox's lead, regardless of whether that lead is consistent with Seamonkey's heritage and the expectations of its users. Having just read Justin's message (above), it seems to me that Seamonkey is indeed suffering as a result of those two philosophies, and I would therefore like to offer, for serious consideration, an alternative which I /think/ might help to retain Seamonkey's existing user base, and perhaps even enlarge it if Firefox users are similarly getting p****d off with the problems that seem automatically to follow from the need to release on such a tight time-scale. I would like to propose that Seamonkey continue to make use of Firefox and Gecko as its core components (I do not know to what extent it also draws on Thunderbird), but rather than slavishly following Firefox's 6-week cycle, it adopts an altogether more leisurely approach. What I propose is that Seamonkey aim at a 6-month release cycle, using Firefox/Gecko from six months ago as its basis. This will allow adequate time to identify bugs, features that are counter-intuitive to Seamonkey users, ill-advised design decisions, and so on. This does not mean that later Firefoxes/Geckos will necessarily be ignored; if, for example, they address a bug in the version selected as the basis for the next Seamonkey, then of course the bug fix can be incorporated. But there should be no last-minute (or last week, or perhaps even last month) changes : there should be a good, stable Seamonkey in beta-test for at least a month before it is released to Seamonkey users in general. Comments, please ? Philip Taylor _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
Towards an alternative way forward for Seamonkey
Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd) Thu, 06 Oct 2011 07:55:39 -0700
- Towards an alternative way forward for Se... Philip TAYLOR (Webmaster, Ret'd)
- Re: Towards an alternative way forwa... Lee
- Re: Towards an alternative way forwa... Rob Steinmetz
- Re: Towards an alternative way forwa... MCBastos
- Re: Towards an alternative way f... Paul B. Gallagher
- Re: Towards an alternative w... MCBastos
- Re: Towards an alternati... PhillipJones
- Re: Towards an alte... PhillipJones
- Re: Towards an alternati... Paul B. Gallagher
- Re: Towards an alte... Justin Wood (Callek)
- Re: Towards an alte... MCBastos

