On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 07:48:04 -0600 "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <[email protected]> wrote:
> oppiman wrote: > > > I've been using TB and FF for a long time. Recently I found myself using > > Chrome more and more. //yeah, shame on me But I don't want to get rid of > > FF completely. So know I'm thinking about installing Seamonkey to > > replace TB and FF with one tool. > > Whatever you do, don't uninstall Firefox. It is *always* good to have > multiple browsers, for several reasons. I would say dont uninstall Chrome, FF and SM are too close as far the engine goes, if you have trouble on a site with one, most likely the other will behave the same too. > > > What functionality would I loose? > > Possibly the odd add-on/extension or toolbar where the developer hasn't > considered SeaMonkey. > > > What would I win? > > Not much. Not even fewer clicks. Well, SM with mails and all (~20000 mails, gdata provider, gcontactsync, pgp, lightning) uses as much memory as Firefox or TB alone (10-20% more after a while, but still). That might be a win for someone who has lower RAM. You dont have to run them separately - you have the mail button on the lower left corner, you can close the mail component, it will sync in background and notify if there are new mails. > > > Can I import all settings and data from TB? You can. They are 99% the same. I transferred mail and whatnot between them. You can even brute-copy everything (mail folders, contacts), but i dont recommend it. > > Can Seamonkey browser sync with FF online data? Seamonkey 2.7 syncs with FF, just make sure you have close versions. > > What is "FF online data" in your definition? > > Personally, I use Thunderbird and Firefox, and I'm stickin' with 'em. The > wife is the SeaMonkey user on this computer -- so we each have our own > set. > -- O zi buna, Kertesz Laszlo _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
