Chris Ilias wrote:
On 12-03-25 11:16 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 3/25/12 2:23 AM, Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
I submitted bug #738948,
<snip>
What I do not understand is why, if Kimura is so adamant that the user
should have NO option, the implementation of bug #376997 did not
contain
code to block installation of the Old Default Image Style extension.
In this case, I think it would be best to just ask him. I don't see
what good it does to ask here.
He was asked https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376997#c87
among other places and his answers didn't make any sense, at least to
me. If you read bugs 376997, 738948, 376997, and 713230 you just have
to get the feeling that the developers just don't care about users at
all. Particularly 713230 marked RESOLVED WONTFIX with an attachment
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=713230#c55 of the type of
content that will no longer display correctly. And look at the number
of bugs that have been marked as duplicates of all these...... At
least there is an extension that makes it display the old way and that
satisfies me (thank you Dagger), but I just hate to read these bugs
and see the direction Firefox development is going. At least it open
source and when they PO enough people somebody can fork it (and if you
think it's not possible with a project this big take a look at
LibreOffice).
Jim
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
