Daniel wrote:
Would I be correct to think that if I change the "Font for:" to
something else, I might change the group of characters that might be
displayed, whilst if I changed the serif, I would be changing the shape
of the characters displayed??

I cannot tell from your description whether you're right or wrong. ;-)

As I said, "Fonts for:" lists encodings, while "Serif", "Sans-serif" and "Monospace" are typefaces.

If you have a very simple website which doesn't specify any styling through CSS or font tags, then you'd typically get headings rendered using a sans-serif font like Arial or Helvetica, and all the rest rendered using a serif font like Times.

A typical but older en-US website would probably use an encoding like ISO-8859-1, also known as ISO Latin 1. This is equivalent to the "Western" option of the "Fonts for:" list. A more modern website would use Unicode instead (e.g. UTF-8), which currently relates to the "Other Languages" option. Both kinds of websites, though using different encodings, could make use of the same typefaces (e.g. sans-serif and serif). For full flexibility, the user (you) may choose which fonts to use for any combination of encoding and typeface. This is what the Fonts preferences pane allows you to select.

In neither the "Fonts for:" nor "Typeface" drop-downs do I see Unicode
listed, so how does it fit in.....or is this set on my computer rather
than with-in SM??

Actually that's exactly what the discussion that Philip started is all about. Currently, at least with an en-US build, there is no option that reads "Unicode". But there is one named "Other Languages" (under "Fonts for:"), which in fact is Unicode, just mislabeled.

HTH

Jens

--
Jens Hatlak <http://jens.hatlak.de/>
SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker <http://smtt.blogspot.com/>
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to