Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Philip TAYLOR wrote:
Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Since your target will never be reached, the unintended consequence
is that no new features will ever be added.
But the browser will get incrementally better and better; that seems
more than a fair trade-off to me.
Different people have different definitions of "better." Mine includes
the addition of new features; polishing and polishing the existing
program while standing in place and watching our competitors grow isn't
enough for me. YMMV.
There are some standing really annoying interface and QA type bugs that
aren't problems for competitors that are problems for SM. Things like
that should be prioritized and fixed first in order to address/enhance
UE concerns, *if* the team is actually serious about being
"competitive". Sometimes I wonder...
--
- Rufus
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
