Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
John Bessa wrote:
and my view is that composer is the way to go.
Composer is extremely old and hasn't been looked after in many
years. I'd suggest, if you want something this simple, that you look
into BlueGriffon, which is still currently being developed.
<http://www.bluegriffon.org/>
...
Given that situation, and since BlueGriffon is a "next-generation Web
editor based on the rendering engine of Firefox," how about the
developers start bundling /that/ instead of Composer?
I'm guessing they don't have distribution rights for Bluegriffon, and
nobody on the small SM team has time to chase it up!!
--
Daniel
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:21.0) Gecko/20100101
Firefox/21.0 SeaMonkey/2.18 Build identifier: 20130403022820
or
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:20.0)
Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17 Build identifier: 20130320191715
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
