Thank you, Paul. > On my machine, the current versions of Flash and SeaMonkey play very > nicely together. FWIW. Well, because (after having posted this) I have found someone else's post https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/mozilla.support.seamonkey/6MHJH1AjwwQ declaring similar problem, I am pretty sure the problem has not been imagined by me. Yet, I believe it might be due to my machine's specific settings or to some other software installed on my machine, but analyzing that would probably be too complicated, let alone time consuming. I feel now fine with SM 2.15 and an older Flash (I have found old versions 'for developper only' and have downgraded also to January 2013 11.5.sth.sth. version for 'compatibility' reasons [stupid?]).
And I share the opinion of LnrB in a reply to the other post mentioned: > I do not for a moment deny that some people have "security issues" with > these programs. However I have not, and quite frankly I don't care how > "old" or "out of date" an application is, as long as it does what I want > it to do I'll keep it. (The whole reply is worth reading). > > Proszę bardzo. > Jak miło! > > No need to SHOUT, we can hear you fine. Oh, I am sorry, if it has bothered you and anyone else, it has not been intended, only my Caps Lock has inadvertently got activated and I have simply been too lazy to retype the topic title again, and I haven't thought about how it might be felt by someone else. Maciej _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
