EE wrote:

> You should make a habit of emptying the trash after deleting messages,
> and then compacting the folders.  And do not use the inbox for storage.
>  It was not meant for that.  This page was written for Thunderbird, but
> it also applies to SeaMonkey:
> http://kb.mozillazine.org/Keep_it_working_%28Thunderbird%29

These may well represent good advice (the cited document states "Keep
the Inbox empty. Move new messages that you want to keep to another
folder after you've read them. This may help avoid corrupting your Inbox
folder, and will help maintain best performance.", but in
my experience neither is acually necessary.  My inbox accumulates
/all/ e-mail for the current calendar year (21628 messages to date)
and I use shift-delete when mass-deleting so my "Deleted items"
is normally virtually empty.  If, as both you and the author of
the cited article state, "Do not use the inbox for storage / Keep the
Inbox empty", then I would argue that the current behaviour of
Seamonkey is sub-optimal and it should /automatically/ move all
read items into a different folder (e.g., "Read") so that it enforces
the very principle that it enshrines.

Philip Taylor
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to