hawker wrote:
On 11/18/2013 7:37 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
WaltS wrote, On 18/11/2013 17:02:
On 11/18/2013 10:52 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
Bryan v. Roache wrote, On 18/11/2013 14:18:
Desiree wrote, On 11/18/2013 6:03 AM:
I see a 2.22.1 version on Mozilla FTP site but it is not offered by
internal update checking. What gives?
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
yes what gives? and more importantly what are the new features in this
new version as well?8-)
The more important is not the new features, but the big list of bugs
corrected by this version ? Isn't it ?
Because each time a new version appear, we got more new bugs - that will
never be corrected.
How do you know *new* bugs won't be corrected? Isn't SM 2.22.1 a bug
fix release?
What new bug bug are you seeing?
Bof, just one ; the line spacing problem.
I am under 2.17 and i want to upgrade, but each time a new release
appeared, we got at least one new bug more.
And those bugs are not corrected under 2.22. I don't speak about 2.22.1.
Just another thing: I did not know how to get the list of all bugs i
voted for, just by memory 99% of them are uncorrected.
My Signature
Well if I were you I would stay at 2.17 till 2.24.x or 2.25 if you can. It
sounds like that is when most of the big ones are scheduled to be fixed. Some
look like they will never be fixed unfortunately. I accidentally hit upgrade
rather than "go away" on a nag screen and now I am there on one machine and
suffering. The latest round of bugs is a PITA. At some point I need to suck it
up and deal with them (because my version will be too old) or finally come to
terms with the fact that it looks like SM doesn't have enough development
support to continue and force myself to FF/TB. It is really seeming like SM is
a slowly dieing beast.
I wish there was a way to help, I offered server space for an official 64 bit
Linux build, not accepted, I can give some $ if that would help, but after
looking at that code won't offer to fix bugs, as SM depends on mainline code
which mutates rapidly enough to be an issue.
It reminds me of where I was when I was faced with that Eudora was now too
outdated to use anymore (couldn't read many HTML e-mails or any Android
E-mails), even though it had features I used everyday that were not in TB/SM -
esp the junk and search implementation.
--
Bill Davidsen <[email protected]>
We are not out of the woods yet, but we know the direction and have
taken the first step. The steps are many, but finite in number, and if
we persevere we will reach our destination. -me, 2010
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
