On 2/12/2014 8:02 AM, Rick Merrill wrote: > Which is the more reliable way to forward emails: inline or as an attachment? > > > For raw text InLine is clearly better. > > For email in MIME encoding either method seems to work equally well. > > For email with JPG attachments either method appears to work fine. > > > But For fwd of email in HTML it makes a difference depending on what > client is sending and what client is receiving. When pictures are > embedded in HTML a number of strange things will happen. Sometimes > you may see a bunch of broken-pictures then the actual pictures. > Sometimes your recipient will say "it would be better with the > pictures". > > As a <snob> user of only SeaMonkey I can't identify with users of > "Outlook whatever" ;-) >
Since many people block attachments or at least do not allow them to be opened automatically, I feel that inline is the only choice. -- David E. Ross <http://www.rossde.com/> On occasion, I filter and ignore all newsgroup messages posted through GoogleGroups via Google's G2/1.0 user agent because of spam, flames, and trolling from that source. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
