Trane Francks wrote, On 12/02/2014 23:35:
On 2/13/14 1:02 AM +0900, Rick Merrill wrote:
Which is the more reliable way to forward emails: inline or as an
attachment?
For raw text InLine is clearly better.
For email in MIME encoding either method seems to work equally well.
For email with JPG attachments either method appears to work fine.
But For fwd of email in HTML it makes a difference depending on what
client is sending and what client is receiving.
When pictures are embedded in HTML a number of strange things will
happen. Sometimes you may see a bunch
of broken-pictures then the actual pictures. Sometimes your
recipient will say "it would be better with the pictures".
As a <snob> user of only SeaMonkey I can't identify with users of
"Outlook whatever" ;-)
Personally, I always use attachments. They're cleaner to look at due
to the lack of header splatter all over the message. If you're
removing the headers in in-line forwards, you may as well just use
Reply instead.
BUT, if you want to remove only some part of the headers forward is better.
And, due to the fact that SM will not permit me when i do a Reply to
insert the quoting of the headers .. i am obliged to NEVER use the Reply
and always use Forward .... the problem now is that i cannot "Forward to
all" ... , so i need to prepare a "Reply" and prepare a "Forward" and
fiddle ..... SM developper did not want to have an option to quote
headers when we do a reply, just and only just because microsoft product
do it !!!! ggrrrrrr......
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
