On 4/13/14 12:08 PM +0900, Geoff Welsh wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
Philip Taylor wrote:
PhillipJones wrote:
(I'm on Beta Channel)
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. "If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
Practise what you preach ? :-)
I try to. I update to 26.1 beta only for security reasons.
I had to revert back to 25.0 beta because of this major problem
......
Forgive my ignorance of the hacking world, but how is a Beta of any
software more secure than stable version?
GW
If SeaMonkey stable were to have critical security vulnerabilities that
were fixed in the current beta, it would possibly be more secure to be
running the beta. The caveat there is that beta code is often unstable
and, therefore, can present unforeseen difficulties.
--
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// Trane Francks [email protected] Tokyo, Japan
// Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
