On 04/13/2014 07:01 PM, WaltS48 wrote: > On 04/13/2014 12:53 PM, Christian Riechers wrote: >> On 04/13/2014 04:43 PM, PhillipJones wrote: >>> Geoff Welsh wrote: >>>> PhillipJones wrote: >>>>> Philip Taylor wrote: >>>>>> PhillipJones wrote: >>>>>>> (I'm on Beta Channel) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. "If it's Fixed, Don't Break it" >>>>>> >>>>>> Practise what you preach ? :-) >>>>> >>>>> I try to. I update to 26.1 beta only for security reasons. >>>>> I had to revert back to 25.0 beta because of this major problem >>>>> ...... >>>> >>>> Forgive my ignorance of the hacking world, but how is a Beta of any >>>> software more secure than stable version? >>> >>> Even Beta Channel versions go through security updates They are no less >>> secure than regular versions. They are just tinkering with the code to >>> add features or make more efficient. >> >> But reverting to 25.0 beta after 25.0 has been released is a silly idea. > > I'm on 29.0b7. Are you referring to SeaMonkey 2.25? AFAIK there is no 25 > or 26.
My bad. Seamonkey 2.25 beta and 2.26 beta respectively. I guess that's what Phillip was talking about. -- Christian _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
