Trane Francks: ><http://www.living-intentionally.com/media/images/msgpanehdr.png>
*IEEHHH* Meine Güte. As always, pictures are better than many words. :) >Interestingly, I think I've found a bug. As you can clearly see from the >above screen shot, what you would expect to see as User-Agent is being >displayed as X-Mailer. *HOWEVER* .... > >I toggled my View | Headers to Normal and then back to All and now the >view has completely changed: > ><http://www.living-intentionally.com/media/images/aftertoggle.png> That is as it should be. >As you can see, the headers being displayed have now changed. I am led >to surmise that over time, the code to display the headers in the >Message Pane has changed over time and that a toggle of the view >refreshes things. > >So, try toggling your View | Headers | All to Normal and then back to >All. I can not reproduce your first picture. Even after disabling Mnenhy and restarting SM. I have tried several times switching from All to Normal and back. You should try with a fresh test profile. >It may very well fix your problem. The problem, that X-Mailer is not shown as User-Agent in the header pane? That was solved by disabling Mnenhy and restarting SM. So i am taking back the word deterioration. In this case. ;) What problem? That X-Mailer is not shown in the header pane? >>>It's being given a different name for some reason that I cannot fathom. > >And now it appears to have been a bug. I have had View | Headers | All >as my choice since back in the Netscape Communicator days and have never >changed it till just now. For whatever reason, doing so has changed >everything. > >And it does seem to be a bug. It seems to be necessary to toggle the >headers view between All and Normal and back again for every bloody folder. Until someone can reproduce it i would hesitate to call it a bug. ;) >> It would be better if X-Mailer would be displayed as X-Mailer in the >> header pane, not as User-Agent. I fully agree with that. On the other >> hand, despite of the naming, the content of the user agent is still >> valuable. :) > >I would rightly expect that X-Mailer is a completely separate header and >that if it exists at all, its content will be displayed independent of >User-Agent. I wrote, that i agree with that. *g* But better the content with a wrong name than no user agent at all. Hartmut _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
