On 10/06/2014 10:19 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > >> Since linux64 does exist (in unofficial) and we release langpacks you can >> install into linux64, we have not made that process a higher priority, than, >> say, actually releasing betas or releases in general. (You'll note that the >> latest round of betas are still delayed). >> >> I thank you for your continued interest, and hope to have more to share >> "soon". >> >> ~Justin Wood (Callek) > > It's not lack of an official release that bothers me as much as having to > spend > a lot of time trying to find a version of Lightning which works with each 64 > bit > update (in some cases I fail). I believe that's true for other packages as > well, > but Lightning is my one and only blocker to upgrade, other than outright bugs > like saving bookmarks and/or passwords in recoverable format. > > Would it be possible for someone to add a URL for that to the release notes? > To > me that is vastly more important 64 bit support than making a package > official > or not. Again, I suspect other 64 bit users have a similar issue with other > packages, I'll let them make their own case. >
Lightning updates have been working just fine for me recently w/linux 64 and 32 bit. However when they don't I have this page bookmarked: <https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Calendar/Calendar_Versions> and refer to that for the version numbers. I also have this bookmarked: <http://download.cdn.mozilla.net/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/releases/> Note: I'm currently running SM 2.30: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/33.0 SeaMonkey/2.30 and Lightning 3.5b1 {e2fda1a4-762b-4020-b5ad-a41df1933103} _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
