On 27/10/2014 04:49, Philip Chee wrote: > On 27/10/2014 02:36, Mason83 wrote: >> On 26/10/2014 14:22, Philip Chee wrote: > >>> Backward compatibility. Some people have written or are using scripts >>> that are hardcoded for seamonkey or for seamonkey-bin >> >> Then it should be a link (either hard or soft), not an actual copy, >> taking up space in the file system ;-) > > For that to work we would need a real installer. Linux distros might > have the ability to do that as a post install step. But the official > binaries are just packed into an archive.
I'm not sure I understand the problem. They can put symlinks in the archive. What am I missing? Regards. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
