On 15/11/14 17:02, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
On 14/11/2014 03:57, Daniel wrote:

But, MCBasto, surely you are aware that some, here, are sticking with SM
2.26.1 because of other problems they are experiencing with later
versions!?!?

Sure, although personally, I haven't noticed such problems.

But, the long and short of it is that if there WAS a bug in 2.26, it
WON'T be fixed in 2.26. That version no longer receives patches. It's
over. Finito. That ship has sailed.

If newer versions don't present the bug, there's no point arguing about
it. It's a FIXED bug. . Argue about whatever issues are keeping you from
updating to the latest version. Whatever was the fix WON'T be backported
to 2.26.

That wasn't the point; read more carefully.

Daniel is saying there are problems with /later/ versions, that's why
he's not upgrading. For him, 2.26.1 is the last good version.

Close, but not quite!!

Others are saying that they have been having problems with later versions so are sticking with SM 2.26.1

*Daniel* has already moved on to 2.30b1 and, now, 2.31b1 on Linux!! SM2.29 on Win7, as shown in my sig file!!

--
Daniel

User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.29 Build identifier: 20140829003846
or
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.31 Build identifier: 20141020202138
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to