On 18/11/2014 3:09 AM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 11/17/2014 2:10 AM, Daniel wrote:
On 17/11/14 02:17, Thee Chicago Wolf (MVP) wrote:
I use SM for browsing and Agent for NGs. Agent manages NNTP so much
better than SM, for em at least.
Thanks so much for this response, TCW, but then one must ask "Why use
just part of SeaMonkey (and ForteAgent) rather than Firefox (and
ForteAgent)?? (Here I am assuming that you also use ForteAgent for Mail
as well as NG!)
Is Ff that much worse/inflexible at browsing than SM??
I find the user interface in SeaMonkey to be far superior to the user
interface in Firefox. Firefox's user interface has been "dumbed down"
to protect novice users.
Thanks, David, and I see from your User Agent that you have a preference
for TB for your NG's at least.
--
Daniel
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.29 Build identifier: 20140829003846
or
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:34.0) Gecko/20100101
SeaMonkey/2.31 Build identifier: 20141020202138
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
