Lemuel Johnson wrote: > W3BNR wrote: >> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >>> No, I did not miss your comments. I reported my own experience. >>> Regardless of what you decide to do, it is still a horribly designed >>> page - that fails in one way or another in multiple browsers of mine. >> >> I wonder what wysiwyg conposer they used for the site. It is badly >> designed and a verification at W3C shows 10 errors in HLTM5. That >> means it probably will work in M$IE. I don't use IE so I can't check >> out my thoughts on that.
I too looked at the W3C errors at only ten. That is probably because there is very little HTML to make an error with. There is, however, a ton of JavaScript. > Looks like a WIX site. Proof again that making it easy doesn't make it > good. Heh. I've seen their TV ads. No mention of "works with any browser." I'd still be reluctant to blame SeaMonkey/Firefox for the problems. -- -bts -This space for rent, but the price is high _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
