In <news:hqgdnuc00u_wif7jnz2dnuu7-tudn...@mozilla.org>, Ray_Net <tbrraymond.schmit...@tbrscarlet.be> wrote:
> »Q« wrote on 24/01/2015 04:48: > > In > > <news:mailman.9195.1422047845.26609.support-seamon...@lists.mozilla.org>, > > mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: > > > >> Stripping whitespace allows long links, wrapped across lines in a > >> plain-text email, to still work. If the whitespace was encoded to > >> form the URI, the link wouldn't work. This is also mentioned in RFC > >> 3986 Appendix C, which someone mentioned earlier in the thread. > > Yes, either way, something breaks. Instead of removing all the > > whitespace (as per the RFCs), only whitespace containing a CRLF > > could be removed, and whitespace consisting only of a single > > ' ' (Ed's case) could be percent-encoded. (Not that I'm saying it > > would be worth anyone's effort to implement such an algorithm.) > > Very strange your proposal of CRLF .... > Would you replace this url > > <http://edmullen.net/temp/Stan Rogers - The Witch of the > Westmorland.mp3> > > by this sone ? (i never think of writtinf an url this way :-) ) > <http://edmullen.net/temp/Stan > Rogers > - > The > Witch > of > the > Westmorland.mp3> No. (Sorry to be so terse, but I can't think of anything else to say about it.) [crossposted, followup set to mozilla.general] _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
