On 08/07/2015 05:05, Paul Bergsagel wrote: > Maybe the time has come to reconsider how often SeaMonkey needs to be > updated. Does SeaMonkey benefit, in the long run, with such a rapid > update schedule? If SeaMonkey adopted a less frequent update schedule > would the net benefits be greater than if SeaMonkey continued with the > current rapid update schedule?
Funny you should say that! https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/firefox-dev/2015-July/003063.html http://venturebeat.com/2015/07/06/mozillas-plans-for-firefox-more-partnerships-better-add-ons-faster-updates-and-more/ _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
