On 10/15/2017 8:12 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 10/14/2017 11:57 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
>> Richard Owlett composed on 2017-10-14 23:41 (UTC-0500):
>>
>>> Felix Miata wrote:
>>
>>>> Richard, you might wish to try an alternative to using style none on
>>>> Wikipedia.
>>>> I've attached my personally created user CSS for Wikipedia. You could
>>>> place it
>>>> in your profile's chrome directory (create if it does not already exist),
>>>> and
>>>> call it through userContent.css (create if it does not already exist,
>>>> append to
>>>> it if it does) in that same directory with this line:
>>
>>>> @import url("wikipedia.css");
>>
>>>> Restart required to take effect. Simply delete those files to eliminate
>>>> their
>>>> effects.
>>
>>> Your attachment didn't come thru. Does this group allow attachments?
>>> Please email me the attachment. Thank you.
>>
>> I know better, but something had me thinking this was going to the
>> debian-user
>> mailing list. :-p
>>
>> Here it is for any and all interested:
>> http://fm.no-ip.com/Share/wikipedia.css
>>
>
> Browsing it and some MozillaZine articles suggests a neat solution as
> there only a half-dozen sites I regularly visit that annoy me significantly.
>
> The combination of adding '@import url("wikipedia.css");' to
> userContent.css whose first line starts with '@-moz-document
> domain(wikipedia.org) ' suggests I could do that for each.
My solution -- using PrefBar's CSS Checkbox -- works for me in situation
that will not work with the userContent.css solution. I visit a Web
site where I read amateur fiction. When I view a Web page for a
particular story, the site's CSS forces the same color (blue) for
visited and unvisited links to the chapters. I uncheck the CSS Checkbox
to get red links for those chapters I have already read and blue links
for those chapters that I have not yet read. After selecting a new
chapter, I then check the CSS Checkbox because the rest of the site's
CSS provides a pleasant formatting. There are several other Web sites
where I toggle the CSS for similar reasons.
--
David E. Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>
By allowing employers to eliminate coverage for birth control
from their insurance plans, President Trump has guaranteed there
will be an increase in the demand for abortions.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
