Frank-Rainer Grahl wrote:
Back up your profile and find it out. For me much better than 2.49.x but
ymmv. Some old extensions might be broken because of all the changes.
FRG
JAS wrote:
How stable are the SM 2.53 builds by WG9s? I currently run SM 2.49.4
32 bit on Win 7 Pro
Thanks,
JAS
One question-> Is there anything major that fails in the 2.53 builds by
W9Gs? Is the browser and email usable (i.e. bug proof enough) for use
full time? I am aware that the profile for 2.49.x and 2.53.x are not
compatible. I using an iMac and can revert to 2.49.x if need be using
Time Machine. Is 2.53.x of a quality that I can switch to it full time?
Thanks in advance for any replies.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
