On 3/7/2020 11:47 AM, EE wrote:
Steve Dunn wrote:
There seems to be a fair bit of potential for extensions that
work in 2.49.x to break in 2.53.1, based on what people have been
posting here. I can't say I'm surprised, given that the developers
have to try to maintain compatibility with an obsolete extension
system while grafting in components from a browser that moved to a
modern extension system a few years ago, but since extensions are
important, it's kind of a problem if the stop working.
Is there a way to know for sure which of your favourite
extensions will work in 2.53.1, or is it a case of back up, hope for
the best, and be prepared to uninstall 2.53.1, reinstall 2.49.5, and
restore your backup?
-Steve
Back up the profile first before you upgrade. You can then restore it
before going back to the older version.
Or make a new SM installation and profile?
--
"If I find one beer can in that car, it's over!" --Red; "And no donuts
either! Ants!" --Kitty from That '70s Show pilot
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see
this signature correctly.
/\___/\ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.ma.cx /
/ /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.home.dhs.org
| |o o| | Axe ANT from its address if shown & e-mailing privately.
\ _ / Please kindly use Ant nickname & URL/link if crediting.
( )
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
