What is different about how a transient node, and a permanent node attempts contacts with the nodes in its routeing table, or about how they respond? With the same set of nodes, my transient node easily contacts 30 or 50 of them >50% of the time, but the permanent node manages <2%, and therefore drops them all. It isn't just overloading, because the same thing happens when the node is just servicing about 20 requests per hour, and has only one or two references left.Vitenka - Zen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: <SNIP>Do hosts transmit routing tables to each other periodically? Obviously you wouldn't want to trust a routing table you have been sent - but you could at least harvest new node addreses from it.No. If other nodes can push references into your routing table, the whole anonymity aspect of freenet goes up in smoke as the CIA/FBI/whoever "fixes" everyone's routing tables to point to them.I don't think the 'time until your routing table is sensible' is actually my problem though - my whole routing table keeps getting eaten. I'm rolling back to build 527.Try a different set of seed nodes. Thelema
--
Roger Hayter
_______________________________________________
support mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
