On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 08:30:29AM +0000, Roger Hayter wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Edgar Friendly > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >Vitenka - Zen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > ><SNIP> > >>Do hosts transmit routing tables to each other > >>periodically? Obviously you wouldn't want to trust > >>a routing table you have been sent - but you could > >>at least harvest new node addreses from it. > >> > >No. If other nodes can push references into your routing table, the > >whole anonymity aspect of freenet goes up in smoke as the > >CIA/FBI/whoever "fixes" everyone's routing tables to point to them. > > > >>I don't think the 'time until your routing table is > >>sensible' is actually my problem though - my whole > >>routing table keeps getting eaten. I'm rolling > >>back to build 527. > >> > >Try a different set of seed nodes. > > > >Thelema > > What is different about how a transient node, and a permanent node > attempts contacts with the nodes in its routeing table, or about how > they respond? With the same set of nodes, my transient node easily > contacts 30 or 50 of them >50% of the time, but the permanent node > manages <2%, and therefore drops them all. It isn't just overloading, > because the same thing happens when the node is just servicing about 20 > requests per hour, and has only one or two references left. Please try 530. > > -- > Roger Hayter >
-- Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet/Coldstore open source hacker. Employed full time by Freenet Project Inc. from 11/9/02 to 11/11/02. http://freenetproject.org/
msg01995/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
